Codebold IT Solutions · Product Design
Product design decisions are business decisions — which features make the first release, what gets cut to hit a launch date, which metric a screen is actually meant to move. We work from the roadmap backward: scoping an MVP that tests the real hypothesis instead of everything you could eventually build.
— What you get
Scroll →
01
The first release scoped around the one core assumption that actually needs testing, instead of every feature you could eventually build.
02
Each screen designed with a clear job tied back to a business or user metric — not included because it seemed like a good idea at the time.
03
Scope cut deliberately so what ships is focused enough to actually tell you something real about product-market fit.
04
What makes the first release and what gets cut treated as real business decisions, discussed openly, not quietly decided in a design file.
05
The MVP ships fast specifically so real usage data can shape what actually gets built next, instead of guessing at v2 in a vacuum.
06
The same team that designs the product builds it, so what ships matches what was actually scoped and tested.
— How a product roadmap turns into a scoped MVP
01
01
We define the one core assumption the first release actually needs to test — not a wishlist of features, a single specific question worth answering.
02
Features are ranked by what proves the hypothesis versus what can genuinely wait for v2 — the hardest and most valuable conversation in the whole process.
03
Every screen is designed with a clear job tied back to a business or user metric — if a screen doesn't move a metric or serve the hypothesis, it doesn't make the cut.
04
The MVP launches fast, and real usage data — not more speculation — shapes what actually gets built next.
— Why Codebold
Building software since 2013.
What makes the first release and what gets cut discussed openly against the actual hypothesis, not quietly decided by whatever felt easiest to design.
Scoped around one core assumption, so what ships tells you something real about product-market fit instead of just existing.
Fixes, updates, and the next feature are part of the relationship — not a renegotiation every time something needs to change.
— Tech depth
— Good questions
By defining the one core hypothesis the first release actually needs to test, then ranking every feature by whether it proves that or can genuinely wait for v2.
Both — the same team designs and builds, so what ships matches what was actually scoped, without a handoff gap losing details in translation.
We'll work from it, but expect us to push back on scope — a roadmap with everything in the first release usually isn't testing one clear hypothesis, it's delaying the launch.
Yes — the design files and the codebase are yours from day one.
We stay on. Fixes, updates, and the next feature are part of the relationship, not a separate negotiation.
Depends on scope — a genuinely focused MVP can launch in a couple of months. You'll get a clear timeline after a discovery call.
— Let's talk
Tell us what you're building — we respond to every enquiry within 24 hours, with next steps, not a sales pitch.
Working with clients internationally, since 2013.
